Knowledge Hub

This 2-population 3-strategy EGT model resolves optimal long-term subway operation extension decisions. It balances subway companies' profitability and costs with passengers' rising night travel demand and satisfaction. Crucially, it provides policymakers a foundation for regulating extensions via coordinated subsidies and penalties, promoting synchronization and the night-time economy

The FU-ILP model and TB&P algorithm jointly optimize Fixed Automated Station (FAS) locations and UAV cruising routes, minimizing redundant distance and cycle time. This supports policymakers and transportation departments in defining optimal UAV configurations and regulating FAS deployment for continuous surveillance. This enhances traffic operational efficiency for citizens and fosters intelligent cities

This hierarchical framework addresses the Air Cargo Network Planning and Scheduling Problem with Minimum Stay Time (ACNPSP-ST). It optimizes hub location, flight deployment, and timetabling using a matrix-based ALNS heuristic. This allows express companies to significantly minimize freighter cargo stay time and lower storage costs, leading to improved service reliability and enhanced service levels for customers

This two-phase MIP optimization framework generates personalized routes for heterogeneous travelers in MaaS, integrating metros and Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs). It offers system operators decision support to minimize SAV operational costs and manage relocations using a rolling horizon method. This enhances mobility and service efficiency.

This Smart Predict-then-Optimize framework uses MTL-STNN for dynamic demand forecasting and green relocation, integrating unusable bike collection. Route and speed optimization minimizes fuel and carbon emission costs. This improves operators' efficiency and service levels for citizens, significantly supporting policymakers' sustainable mobility and emission reduction goals.

This graph-based deep learning method analyzes COVID-induced shifts in multi-modal travel mobility and community structure evolution. It provides policymakers and transportation planners critical insights to explore strategies promoting sustainable and resilient mobility patterns. Understanding these changes allows operators to optimize routes and improve service quality for users.

A joint optimization MINP model coordinates bus scheduling and reservation seat allocation using heterogeneous fleets. The objective is minimizing bus company operational costs and passengers' waiting cost and aggregation risk. This provides policymakers a critical strategy to align transportation supply with fluctuating demand during public health emergencies.

This Path-based First Train Timetabling (PB-FTT) MINLP model jointly optimizes timetables and passenger paths using specialized TD-RTH/TB&B algorithms. It provides URT operators an effective framework to significantly reduce transfer waiting times (up to 58.91%) and total travel time. This maximizes passenger travel efficiency and supports policymakers in enhancing overall transportation management and service quality 

This multivariate database calculates population-weighted Gini coefficients across NUTS 0-3 regions for air pollution, LST, and green spaces. It offers policymakers a critical foundation for spatial interventions, addressing environmental hazards and resource deprivation. Researchers gain novel capacity for continent-scale inequality studies, ultimately advancing environmental justice for citizens

The geodesign application in Stockholm successfully facilitated co-creating transformative urban plans that balance housing needs and nature-based solutions. This is key for citizens to participate in informed dialogues, enabling policymakers to manage complex trade-offs, and advancing academia’s understanding of planning methodology

Geodesign is vital for citizens to collaboratively co-produce knowledge and bridge perspectives through boundary work (TCM/CSL), enabling policymakers to integrate diverse data and manage complex sustainability trade-offs, and advancing academia by providing a replicable framework for assessing these planning methodologies. 

The REPAiR Geodesign methodology spatially tackles the wicked problem of urban circular economy transition, empowering citizens to actively co-design localized strategies, providing policymakers a decision support system for complex resource management, and contributing to academia through systemic planning advancements. 

Geodesign, a boundary management process, enables citizens to co-create and negotiate sustainable spatial futures, offers policymakers a legitimate tool for decision integration, and advances academia's transdisciplinary research methodology. 

Data-driven procedural Geodesign, exemplified by offshore wind planning, offers citizens transparent outcomes for greater acceptance, empowers policymakers to implement complex large-format spatial mandates, and pushes academia toward geography-guided methodological transformation. 

The web-based TSH Geodesign Tool evaluates transport-space integration at the block scale, empowering citizens with informed urban design recommendations. It provides policymakers essential decision support for TSH system management, and guides academia in developing user-centered PSS and advanced spatial assessment tools. 

Geodesign quantifies urban landscape resilience using metric parameters, empowering citizens with informed adaptation strategies. This helps policymakers control development trajectories, and advances academia through a measurable framework for complex urban resilience assessment. 

Virtual Geodesign for NBS co-design in Costa Rica empowers citizens through equitable, online knowledge co-creation and action design, equips policymakers with tools for integrated river basin management, and informs academia on effective hybrid spatial planning methodologies during crises. 

Remote sensing mapping of Green Space Intensity and Land Surface Temperature in Törökbálint empowers citizens with transparent, understandable urban climate data. This equips policymakers with critical decision support for revising land use mandates and mitigation goals, and advances academia by providing an enhanced, settlement-level best practice for multi-source spatial assessment. 

Geodesign, utilizing digital negotiation methods from the CAMKOX workshop, enables citizens to reach transparent consensus on shared spatial interventions, equips policymakers to bridge the planning-implementation gap, and significantly advances academia's conceptualization of issue-based complexity. 

The emergent Metaverse, driven by ubiquitous GI and Digital Twins, informs geodesign by allowing citizens to actively manipulate and explore future urban scenarios. This equips policymakers with tools for improved plan-making and conflict resolution, and advances academia's research into modeling methodologies and virtual geographic environments 

Integrating the sense of place framework via Geodesign and PPGIS at the River Lahn empowers citizens to connect emotions to spatial design and promote environmental stewardship. This enables policymakers to reduce land use conflicts and advances academia's methodological research on place assessment. 

Applying Geodesign in real-world Italian strategic planning proved effective and rapid, allowing citizens to participate in inclusive, consensus-based processes, providing policymakers a legitimate system for coordinating sector plans and accelerating innovation, and advancing academia by assessing methodology adoption in institutional practice. 

The use of interactive 3D geodesign scenarios for ecologically sensitive areas enables citizens to openly discuss shared resources and future development trajectories, equipping policymakers with a robust visualization tool for enhanced decision-making, and advancing academia's methodology for immersive planning education.

Geodesign experiments in vulnerable Brazilian areas, detailed across four cases, are key for citizens to achieve transformative learning and build informed opinions, provide policymakers with a flexible framework for irregular occupation planning, and advance academia's localized GIS methodology adaptation.

The assessment of GeoDesign potential, driven by digitalization in rural planning, allows citizens transparent online consultation, enabling policymakers to accelerate smart rural development and overcome spatial disparities, while advancing academia’s empirical assessment of implementation readiness. 

Geodesign, utilizing integrated BIM and GIS data models for complex environmental assessments, provides citizens convincing 3D visualization and public communication. It enables policymakers rapid collision detection and decisive action, while advancing academia’s systematization of data workflows and professional planning practice. 

This analysis of Litvish communities reveals latent social and spatial mechanisms defining identity and communal boundaries, empowering citizens to negotiate religious obligations. It enables policymakers to understand and plan for complex identity-based demarcation lines, advancing academia’s research on everyday religious life and urban theory. 

Analyzing Chongqing's rapid, leapfrog-dominated urbanization and shifting socioeconomic drivers provides citizens context for stakeholder consultations, enables policymakers to implement the GeoDesign planning framework for sustainable mountainous development, and informs academia's methodological testing.

The data-informed Geodesign approach measures human-scale living convenience using buildings as analytical units. This empowers citizens with detailed quality-of-life insights, provides policymakers scientific decision support for strategic interventions, and advances academia's methodology for quantifying intangible perceptual urban qualities. 

The GeoS4S academic Module empowers citizens/students with practical skills in systems thinking, multi-stakeholder design, and reflective processing of quantitative impact feedback. It equips policymakers with essential multi-criteria analysis and decision-making tools for complex conflicts, and advances academia through a structured, deep-learning, 6 ECTS e-learning curriculum 

Complexity in current spatial planning practice is mainly linked to the multi-dimensional context characterizing its processes. Recent advances in design methodologies and digital techniques promise unprecedented opportunities not only for managing multiple issues and actors, but also for tracking the evolution of the design options toward the final plan. In this context, the paper explores the potential offered by the collaborative Planning Support System Geodesignhub to record the process workflow and open new path to the design dynamics understanding. 

The open-source Geodesign Decision Support Environment (GDSE) for Circular Economy empowers citizens via transparent visualization and co-design in Urban Living Labs. It equips policymakers with evidence-based impact simulation for spatial resource management, and advances academia by integrating AS-MFA and pioneering geodesign for waste analysis.  

The first Australian application of the Steinitz Geodesign framework empowered diverse stakeholders to negotiate and integrate complex metropolitan plans. It equipped policymakers to break institutional planning silos, and advanced academia's research on collaborative negotiation dynamics and PSS effectiveness.

Collablocation empowers stakeholders to co-design alternative-fuel networks using real-time feedback. It equips policymakers with a metric-driven, transparent infrastructure planning process (AADTT, coverage). Academia benefits from developing and testing this open-source tool for complex location problems 

Collaborative Geodesign tools, tailored to analytical/political rationalities, empower stakeholders by providing dynamic feedback on climate adaptation designs. They equip policymakers with critical decision support by matching the tool's logic to the adaptation issue. This advances academia's methodological framework for PSS selection 

This article discusses the results of a workshop held in Belo Horizonte, Brazil aimed at developing a methodology for the Maria Tereza neighborhood plan, using Geodesign framework and geovisualization strategies to create a collaborative environment and enhance stakeholders' participation. The decision model achieved proved to be a promising support tool for more effective and inclusive neighborhood rehabilitation and land regularization planning policies. 

Collaborative Geodesign tools, tailored to analytical/political rationalities, empower stakeholders by providing dynamic feedback on climate adaptation designs. They equip policymakers with critical decision support by matching the tool's logic to the adaptation issue. This advances academia's methodological framework for PSS selection 

Integrating CA models into the iterative Geodesign framework empowers stakeholders by generating superior urban designs based on quantified land-use impact evaluations (LIIs). It equips policymakers to test planning scenarios against policy goals, advancing academia's formal integration of the positive and normative dimensions of city science 

The Digital Twin of the cultivated landscape empowers stakeholders to evaluate alternatives for rural road networks using objective, detailed data. It equips policymakers to prioritize core road segment modernization based on connected agricultural area indicators, advancing academia's formal coupling of the DT concept with the full Geodesign framework. 

The Honolulu AV Geodesign studio empowered students with anticipatory design skills under uncertainty. It equipped Hawaii policymakers with prototype scenarios (e.g., flexible zones, vegetated streets) via ArcGIS StoryMaps, responding to Governor Ige's AV testing invitation. Academia advanced its adaptation of the Steinitz framework for monodisciplinary landscape architecture pedagogy 

The review of modern public participation methods (PPGIS, VGI, Citizen Science, Geodesign) empowers stakeholders via Geodesign's holistic process, integrating analysis, design, and public involvement. It mandates policymakers pursue symmetric cooperation with residents. Academia advances by synthesizing new concepts rooted in geography and G-ICT progress  

The Princeton University 3D city model empowers multidisciplinary CAL researchers to simultaneously visualize spatial-temporal data (e.g., solar potential, travel behavior) via a simple app. It provides campus policymakers a robust tool for documenting and communicating integrated research results. Academia advances its workflow for persistent 3D campus base maps and visualization tools. 

Geodesign is pivotal for science-based regional planning, successfully integrating climate adaptation measures and development scenarios. It facilitates collaboration among various stakeholders, using evaluation criteria provided by decision-making stakeholders. This approach supports remote cooperation and aims to include local experts and people in future problem-solving efforts.

The CyberGIS approach provides essential online Geodesign capabilities to optimize biomass supply chains under uncertainties. This decision support system enables users and decision makers to perform computationally intensive what-if scenario analysis and facilitates group decision support. It ultimately helps decision makers prioritize effective changes and investments in dynamic supply chain management.

The geodesign procedural concept is essential for sustainable urban transformation, integrating GIS-based tools into collaborative processes. This approach is framed by societal values and local people’s demands, which guide design and evaluation for politically legitimate solutions. It enables heterogeneous participants and decision-makers to gain insights into complex system dynamics, supporting trade-off analysis and effective spatial development strategies.

Geodesign is essential for developing countries to address complex sustainability and conservation conflicts resulting from large-scale development. It enables sophisticated spatial negotiation among stakeholders by providing a platform for process modeling and simulation. This approach promotes public participation and makes scientific knowledge spatially explicit for planners and decision-makers, supporting evidence-based design and local understanding. 

The Geodesign approach is crucial for quantitatively measuring intangible human-scale living convenience. It provides scientific decision support to urban planners and policymakers, enabling the simulation and evaluation of planning strategies. This supports evidence-based urban policy-making, ultimately promoting livability and public benefits.

The geodesign approach is essential for sustainable and collaborative urban planning at the precinct scale. Tools like ESP support decision-makers, planners, and communities by providing 3D visualizations and quantitative performance assessments. This facilitates multi-stakeholder decision-making and engagement.

The geodesign approach is essential for sustainable and collaborative urban planning at the precinct scale. Tools like ESP support decision-makers, planners, and communities by providing 3D visualizations and quantitative performance assessments. This facilitates multi-stakeholder decision-making and engagement.

The Geodesign approach is essential for informed, collaborative decision-making, integrating Authoritative GI with Social Media Geographic Information (SMGI). This provides policymakers and planners with experiential knowledge about community values and needs, supporting pluralist assessments. It ultimately enables a shared, sustainable development process involving citizens and actors.

The Geodesign approach is essential for collaborative planning and the effective communication of stakeholder values. It supports decision-makers in evaluating design alternatives. Tools must be carefully tailored to tasks, prioritizing simplicity for optimal user performance. This process facilitates learning by doing through experimentation.

The Geodesign framework is crucial for evidence-based, collaborative bicycling planning, addressing organizational complexity. It integrates various stakeholders and policymakers, enabling them to evaluate design scenarios using data-driven tools like Agent-Based Modeling. This process fosters community engagement and facilitates effective, informed decision-making for sustainable infrastructure development.

The Participatory GIS (PGIS) is essential for tiered planning by improving visualization, aggregation, and collaboration among participants. It enhances public participation and location awareness and facilitates community aspirations. For policymakers, PGIS supports informed decision-making, helping to prioritize development plans and improve budget efficiency by minimizing misdirection. 

The Geodesign framework, supported by Planning Support Theatres (PSTs) like CAL, is crucial for smart city planning and bridging the PSS implementation gap. PSTs facilitate collaboration among citizens, planning professionals, and governments, supporting decision-making through data visualization and scenario evaluation. This approach ensures tools are co-designed based on user needs.

The Geodesign process is essential for developing flood mitigation alternatives, integrating sustainable landscape design and new spatial technologies. It supports planners and policymakers by providing a framework to assess design options and evidence-based flood protection strategies. Crucially, it enhances quality of life, walkability, and engagement for residents in highly urbanized areas.

Complexity in current spatial planning practice is mainly linked to the multi-dimensional context characterizing its processes. Recent advances in design methodologies and digital techniques promise unprecedented opportunities not only for managing multiple issues and actors, but also for tracking the evolution of the design options toward the final plan. In this context, the paper explores the potential offered by the collaborative Planning Support System Geodesignhub to record the process workflow and open new path to the design dynamics understanding. We will present the first research efforts toward the development of a geodesign process analytical framework taking account of both theories and cases studies.